The toasted sandwich chain created a contest online at a site Quiznos had set up called meatnomeat.com, as well as on iFilm that would invite the public to create commercials that would show Quiznos sandwiches superior to Subways.
It's all in competitive fun right, the rivalry between Pepsi and Coca-Cola, Miller Lite and Bud Lite, Colgate and Crest. Personally, I think the bashed brand still gets a little advertising time by having its name shown. But not to Subway. They're suing Quiznos and iFilm, owned by Viacom, claiming that these ads contained “literally false statements” and depicted Subway in a “disparaging manner.” They're also suing for the ads Quiznos itself created that show passer-bys choosing Quiznos over Subway.
So companies are always suing each other over ad disputes but what about the video contest. Should Quiznos really be sued for what other people created if they just facilitated what costumers already express? They did provoke it and give incentive, but what happens to user-generated video contests like this? This was a short-lived fad that, if Subway wins, will surely be killed off.
At least Quiznos finally got smart and realized that any ads they produced were at best horrible and tried something new. This is better than the talking baby or whatever THIS is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6becf/6becf7caf27a78e449638cbafaf2464b8aaf7e7d" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment